A Web-Based Mind-Body Intervention to Improve Resilience Among Patients With Nontraumatic Painful Upper-Extremity Conditions and Comorbid Risky Substance Use: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nontraumatic painful upper-extremity conditions (NPUCs) are largely age-related degenerations that affect the majority of adults. Most patients with NPUCs do not seek medical care and adjust on their own. Among those who do seek care, approximately 20% report risky substance use, defined as a consumption pattern that increases the risk of harm to physical or psychosocial health. In the context of NPUC, risky substance use is associated with more intense pain, emotional distress, disability, and opioid or other substance misuse (ie, cross-tolerance). Consequently, risky substance use is a significant modifiable risk factor for the progression and maintenance of chronic pain-related disability and comorbid psychopathology among patients with NPUCs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop, adapt, and test the feasibility of the Web-Based Toolkit for Resilient Life Beyond Pain and Substance Use (Web-TIRELESS), a novel, asynchronous, and web-based mind-body intervention aimed at modifying maladaptive pain-coping behaviors in patients with NPUC and comorbid risky substance use. This study illustrates the proposed study design, methodology, and intervention content. METHODS: In aim 1, we will conduct live video qualitative interviews (n=20) with care-seeking adult patients with NPUC and comorbid risky substance use to inform the development and refinement of Web-TIRELESS and study procedures. In aim 2, we propose an open pilot study (n=12) of Web-TIRELESS with exit interviews and pre- and postintervention assessments to evaluate the feasibility, credibility, and acceptability of Web-TIRELESS and refine study procedures. Aim 3 consists of a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of Web-TIRELESS versus minimally enhanced usual care (n=50), both of which follow a web-based modality, to demonstrate the feasibility of recruitment procedures and data collection, as well as the feasibility, credibility, and acceptability of Web-TIRELESS and the control condition (adherence, retention, fidelity, and satisfaction), following prespecified benchmarks. RESULTS: Patient interviews (aim 1) concluded in May 2024 and qualitative analysis is expected to be completed in September 2024. Completion of aim 2 (data collection and analysis) is expected by June 2025. The completion of aim 3 and other study-related operations is anticipated by June 2027. CONCLUSIONS: We will develop and test Web-TIRELESS, the first asynchronous mind-body intervention specifically adapted to enhance resilience in response to chronic pain among individuals with NPUCs and comorbid risky substance use. Results from this 3-aim study (feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of Web-TIRELESS) will be leveraged to inform a future efficacy randomized controlled trial of Web-TIRELESS versus the minimally enhanced usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06366633; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06366633. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/64547.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".