Genetic Interplay Between White Matter Hyperintensities and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Brain-Body Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT MRI-detected white matter hyperintensities (WMH) are often recognized as markers of cerebrovascular abnormalities and an index of vascular brain injury, and are frequently present in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Given the emerging bidirectional communication between the brain-body axis in both WMHs and AD, it is important to understand their genetic underpinnings across the whole body. However, literature on this is scarce. We investigated the brain-body axis by breaking down heritability estimates of these phenotypes across the whole body, – i.e., partitioning heritability. Our aims were to identify genetic underpinnings specific to WMHs, and common between WMHs and AD, by assessing (a) the partitioned heritability of WMHs and AD across the brain-body axis with tissue-specific annotations, (b) the partitioned heritability of WMHs and AD across the brain-body axis with cell-specific annotations, and (c) the genes associated with WMHs and AD, and verifying their expression levels across the whole body. Our tissue-specific analysis revealed that WMH-associated SNPs were significantly enriched in tissues beyond the brain, namely liver, cardiovascular, and kidney – with liver being a common tissue enriched for both WMHs and AD. Our cell-specific analysis showed enrichment of vascular endothelial cells across the tissue types enriched for WMHs, highlighting their central role in the development of WMHs. Additionally, our gene-level analysis highlighted overlapping patterns of tissue enrichment for both WMHs and AD, and showed interactions between WMH and AD associated genes. Our findings provide new insights into the systemic influences potentially contributing to WMH pathology, in particular, multi-system endothelial disorder. We hope that our multisystemic genetic findings will stimulate future WMH-research into specific pathways across the brain-body axis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".