RetroCaptioner: beyond attention in end-to-end retrosynthesis transformer via contrastively captioned learnable graph representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Retrosynthesis identifies available precursor molecules for various and novel compounds. With the advancements and practicality of language models, Transformer-based models have increasingly been used to automate this process. However, many existing methods struggle to efficiently capture reaction transformation information, limiting the accuracy and applicability of their predictions. RESULTS: We introduce RetroCaptioner, an advanced end-to-end, Transformer-based framework featuring a Contrastive Reaction Center Captioner. This captioner guides the training of dual-view attention models using a contrastive learning approach. It leverages learned molecular graph representations to capture chemically plausible constraints within a single-step learning process. We integrate the single-encoder, dual-encoder, and encoder-decoder paradigms to effectively fuse information from the sequence and graph representations of molecules. This involves modifying the Transformer encoder into a uni-view sequence encoder and a dual-view module. Furthermore, we enhance the captioning of atomic correspondence between SMILES and graphs. Our proposed method, RetroCaptioner, achieved outstanding performance with 67.2% in top-1 and 93.4% in top-10 exact matched accuracy on the USPTO-50k dataset, alongside an exceptional SMILES validity score of 99.4%. In addition, RetroCaptioner has demonstrated its reliability in generating synthetic routes for the drug protokylol. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and data are available at https://github.com/guofei-tju/RetroCaptioner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".