Finite element analysis of distraction osteogenesis with a new extramedullary internal distractor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a bone regenerative maneuver, which is conventionally done with external fixators and, more recently, with telescopic intramedullary nails. Despite the proven effectiveness, external approaches are intrusive to the patient's life while intramedullary nailing damages the growth plates, making them unsuitable for pediatric patients. An internal DO plate fixator (IDOPF) was developed for pediatric patients to address these limitations. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the IDOPF can withstand a partial weight bearing scenario and create a favorable mechanical microenvironment at the osteotomy gap for bone regeneration as the device elongates. A finite element model of a surrogated long bone diaphysis osteotomy fixation by means of the IDOPF was created and subjected to axial compression, bending and torsion. As the osteotomy gap increased from 2 mm to 20 mm, under compression, The average axial interfragmentary strains decreased from 2.33% to 0.35%. Stress increased from 179 MPa to 281 MPa at the contact interfaces of the telescopic compartments, which exceeded the endurance limit of stainless steel (270 MPa) but was below its yield limit (415 MPa). These results demonstrate, that the IDOPF can withstand a partial load bearing scenario and provide a stable biomechanical environment conductive to bone healing. However, high contact stresses at the telescopic interfaces of the device are likely to cause wear, as is frequently reported in telescopic fixators. This study is a step towards refining the IDOPF design for clinical use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it