Chloroplast Genome Studies in <i>Zea</i>: Insights into Maize Domestication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to synthesize current knowledge on the chloroplast genome of Zea genus , with a focus on its significance in understanding maize domestication. By examining the structure, function, and comparative genomics of the chloroplast genome, we elucidate the genetic and evolutionary mechanisms underlying the transition from wild teosinte to cultivated maize. Key findings from chloroplast genome studies reveal that maize originated in the Balsas River Valley, highlighting the genetic diversity within the genus Zea and the evolutionary relationships among maize varieties. Chloroplast DNA analysis uncovers patterns of gene flow, hybridization, and introgression, which contribute to the genetic richness of maize. Positive selection on chloroplast genes associated with photosynthesis and stress response underscores the adaptive changes during domestication. Additionally, advancements in genomic technologies and bioinformatics have enhanced the resolution and accuracy of chloroplast genome assembly and analysis. Chloroplast genome studies provide crucial insights into the genetic and evolutionary dynamics of maize domestication. The integration of chloroplast and nuclear genome data offers a comprehensive understanding of the selective pressures and adaptations that have shaped modern maize. These findings have significant implications for maize breeding, conservation, and global food security, emphasizing the importance of continued research and collaboration in the field of chloroplast genomics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".