The Impact of Digital Technologies on Urban Life Quality and Social Dynamics in Bismayah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to explore the interplay between urban design and social interaction in the digital era, specifically focusing on the integration of digital technology and the Internet of Things (IoT) in urban environments.By examining the historical role of urban design in fostering social interactions and the evolving dynamics with technological advancements, the research seeks to understand the impact of digital technology on social interactions in urban settings.The aim of this study is to investigate the perceptions and experiences of residents in Bismayah City regarding urban design and its role in facilitating social interaction.Through a structured questionnaire, the study collects data to analyze the nuanced impact of digital technology on social interactions, highlighting both the benefits and challenges posed by digital integration.The research aims to provide critical insights into the complex relationship between urban design, digital technology, and social interaction, advocating for a balanced approach in urban planning.The analysis of the collected data reveals that digital advancements can enhance connectivity and create new forms of social engagement in urban environments.However, there are concerns about potential reductions in face-to-face interactions, as well as issues surrounding privacy and socio-economic disparities.The study emphasizes the importance of harmonizing technological integration with human-centric aspects of urban spaces.It provides a roadmap for urban planners, technologists, and policymakers, emphasizing the need to create cities that are technologically advanced while also fostering social interactions and community bonds.The study's findings indicate that while digital technology enhances social connectivity and urban engagement, concerns surrounding privacy, reduced face-to-face interactions, and socio-economic disparities were significant.These findings underscore the importance of integrating robust privacy measures and fostering inclusive urban spaces.The research advocates for a balanced approach that ensures technological advancements contribute positively to social interactions while addressing these critical concerns, offering valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".