MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402967779 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.29.24314580

Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Early Parkinson’s Disease via Voice Analysis

2024· preprint· en· W4402967779 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Shen, Pouria Mortezaagha, Arya Rahgozar

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice analysisParkinson's diseaseSpeech recognitionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDiseasePsychologyAudiologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects motor control, leading to symptoms such as tremors or impaired balance. Early diagnosis of PD is crucial for effective treatment, yet traditional diagnostic models are often costly and lengthy. This study explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques, particularly voice analysis, to identify early signs of PD and make a precise diagnosis. Objectives This paper aims to create an automatic detection and prediction of PD binary classification using vocal biomarkers. We will also use explainability to identify latent and important patterns in the input data in retrospect to the target to inform the definition of Parkinson’s through voice characteristics. Finally, a probability generation will be generated to create a scoring system of a patient’s odds of PD as a spectrum. Methods We utilized a dataset comprising 81 voice recordings from both healthy control (HC) and PD patients, applying a hybrid AI model combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The model’s architecture was designed to extract and analyze acoustic features such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), local jitter, and local shimmer, which are all indicative of PD-related voice impairments. Once features are extracted, the AI model will generate prediction labels for HC or PD files. Then, a scoring system will assign a number ranging from 0-1 to each file, indicating the stage of PD development. Results Our champion model yielded the following results: diagnostic accuracy of 91.11%, recall of 92.50%, precision of 89.84%, an F1 score of 0.9113, and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.9125. Furthermore, the use of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided detailed insight into the model’s decision-making process, highlighting the most influential features contributing to a PD diagnosis. The outcomes of the implemented scoring system demonstrate a distinct separation in the probability assessments for PD across the 81 analyzed audio samples, validating our scoring system by confirming that the vocal biomarkers in the audio files accurately correspond with their assigned scores. Conclusion This study highlights the efficacy of AI, particularly a hybrid model combining CNN, RNN, MKL, and Deep Learning in diagnosing early PD through voice analysis. The model demonstrated a robust ability to distinguish between HC and PD patients with significant accuracy by leveraging key vocal biomarkers such as MFCCs, jitter, and shimmer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207