Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé En 1975, Pasolini raconte l’arrivée imprévisible d’une nouvelle forme de fascisme par la métaphore de la disparition des lucioles. Plus de quarante ans plus tard, Georges Didi-Huberman résume ainsi son propos : « Pasolini [contrairement à Benjamin] a fini par désespérer », rangeant d’un même élan Pasolini du côté des prophètes de malheurs. Une telle lecture paraît contestable. Pour en faire la démonstration, cet article s’attarde sur la figure de Cassandre dans le Carnet de notes pour une Orestie africaine (1970), et montre de quelle manière cette antique prophétesse s’inscrit, par le montage pasolinien, dans la lignée benjaminienne de la tradition des opprimés. C’est donc l’écho d’une Cassandre euripidienne dans l’écriture pasolinienne—tous deux se présentant comme des contemporains au sens où l’entend Agamben—qui ressort au terme de l’analyse, laquelle se conclut en imaginant Pasolini en Cassandre heureuse. Ce qui revient à le réhabiliter dans le champ benjaminien de la tradition de l’organisation du pessimisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".