MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402974520 · doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100294

Vegetarian and Vegan Dietary Patterns to Treat Adult Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2024· review· en· W4402974520 on OpenAlexaff
Nanci S. Guest, Sudha Raj, Matthew J. Landry, Ann Reed Mangels, Roman Pawlak, Katelyn Senkus, Deepa Handu, Mary Rozga

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Nutrition · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics
KeywordsType 2 diabetesMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialMedicineVegan DietDiabetes mellitusTraditional medicineInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant-based dietary patterns, including vegetarian and vegan dietary patterns, may help to manage type 2 diabetes (T2DM) by contributing to maintenance of a healthy body weight, improved glycemic control, and reduced risk of diabetes complications. Several diabetes clinical practice guidelines support the use of vegetarian dietary patterns, but there has not been a recently updated systematic review (SR) of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine efficacy. The primary objective of this SR was to examine the effect of vegetarian dietary patterns compared with nonvegetarian dietary patterns in adults with T2DM. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL Database of Controlled Trials, Food Science Source, and SportsDiscus databases were searched for RCTs published from 1998 to May 2023. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Data were pooled using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Full texts of 66 articles were reviewed, and 7 RCTs ( n = 770 participants) were included in this SR. Vegetarian dietary patterns likely reduce hemoglobin A1c [MD (95% CI): –0.40% (–0.59, –0.21)] and body mass index [MD (95% CI): –0.96 kg/m 2 (–1.58, –0.34)] (moderate certainty evidence); may allow for reduced diabetes medication (in 2 of 3 included studies) (low certainty); and may improve metabolic clearance of glucose (insulin sensitivity) [MD (95% CI): 10% (1.86, 18.14)] (very low certainty), compared with nonvegetarian dietary patterns. There were no effects of vegetarian dietary patterns on fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. These findings support the inclusion of vegetarian or vegan dietary patterns as options in nutrition care plans for adults with T2DM. CRD42023396453.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0580.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in NutritionSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207