A Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve and Trough Concentration in Specific Populations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Vancomycin is an antibiotic known to cause nephrotoxicity, particularly when a vancomycin trough of 15 to 20 mg/L, a surrogate for an area under the curve (AUC) of at least 400 mgh/L, is targeted. Although monitoring vancomycin AUC is more resource intensive, it may especially benefit populations expected to be at higher risk of nephrotoxicity. Objective: To describe the proportion of discordance between vancomycin AUC and trough concentration in targeted high-risk populations. Methods: A prospective observational review was conducted on adults receiving intravenous vancomycin for more than 48 hours from May 9 to June 3, 2022. Patients included were elderly, obese, had renal dysfunction, and/or received 4 grams or more of vancomycin daily with a pending vancomycin trough concentration. A peak concentration was ordered by a project team member to calculate AUC to assess discordance. Results: A total of 47 patients were included with 87 vancomycin minimum concentration (Cmin)/AUC pairs analyzed. Discordance was observed in 52.9% of Cmin/AUC pairs in the entire cohort. The majority (79%) of the 43 Cmin levels <15 mg/L had an associated AUC >400 mgh/L and 57% of 21 Cmin levels within the 15 to 20 mg/L range had an AUC >600 mgh/L. Conclusion: A high degree of discordance between vancomycin Cmin and AUC was present in patients considered to be at high risk of nephrotoxicity. Monitoring vancomycin AUC in these patients may reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it