Joint Optimization of Data Acquisition and Trajectory Planning for UAV-Assisted Wireless Powered Internet of Things
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has led to the emergence of a large number of Intelligent Sensing Devices (ISDs). Since their limited physical sizes constrain the battery capacity, wireless powered IoT networks assisted by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for energy transfer and data acquisition have attracted great interest. In this paper, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize system energy efficiency while satisfying the constraints of UAV mobility and safety, ISD quality of service and task completion time. The formulated problem is constructed as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) model, and a Multi-agent Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learning (MCDRL) algorithm is proposed to learn the optimal UAV movement policy. In addition, an ISD-UAV connection assignment algorithm is designed to manage the connection in the UAV sensing range. Finally, performance evaluations and analysis based on real-world data demonstrate the superiority of our solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it