Hemangioendothelioma as a rare cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding - a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious health threat, especially when it originates from the small intestine, often termed small bowel bleeding (SBB). Hemangioendothelioma, a rare vascular tumor, can be a significant yet uncommon cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. This case report highlights hemangioendothelioma's diagnostic challenges and clinical significance in SBB. CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old female experienced six months of intermittent massive rectorrhagia and melena, along with nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, and abdominal pain. Initial endoscopic investigations, including colonoscopy and enteroscopy, did not identify the bleeding source. Imaging studies, including a CT scan and Meckel's scintigraphy, were also inconclusive. Persistent bleeding and a significant drop in hemoglobin levels led to exploratory laparotomy with intraoperative enteroscopy, which revealed a nodular lesion in the small intestine. Histopathological examination confirmed the lesion as hemangioendothelioma. Surgical resection of the lesion stopped the bleeding, and the patient recovered without complications, remaining asymptomatic during follow-ups at one and six months post-surgery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Hemangioendothelioma is a rare, locally aggressive vascular tumor that can present with abdominal pain, bowel obstruction, anemia, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Due to its rarity and location, it often goes undetected in conventional endoscopy. The definitive diagnosis is made through histopathological examination, which shows characteristic endothelial cells and vascular structures. Surgical excision is the primary treatment, although there is a risk of recurrence and metastasis. CONCLUSION: This case underscores hemangioendothelioma's diagnostic challenges and clinical relevance in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Intraoperative enteroscopy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management. Clinicians should consider hemangioendothelioma in similar cases to ensure appropriate treatment and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".