MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402991522 · doi:10.60087/jklst.v3.n4.p200

Convoluted neural network and transfer learning algorithm for improved brain tumor classifications in MRI

2024· article· en· W4402991522 on OpenAlexaff
Diya Raina, Aarna Dawange, Thamaru Bandha, Anureet Kaur, Rakshit Wasekar, Kritika Verma, Saloni Verma, Karan Dhingra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer of learningArtificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmBrain tumorNeurosciencePsychologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant use cases to improve patient care, particularly in medical image analysis. This study aims to develop a deep-learning model for disease classification in medical images and compare its performance in four-class MRI and two-class X-ray classification tasks. We utilize Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for diagnosing pneumonia from chest X-rays and various tumors from brain MRIs, leveraging transfer learning to improve performance. Transfer learning, which reuses pre-trained models like VGG-16, is more efficient than building models from scratch. The VGG-16 model, pre-trained on over a million ImageNet images, achieved 92.7% accuracy. By fine-tuning, we reached 93.6% accuracy. Data augmentation techniques, such as flipping, rotation, and brightness adjustments, further enhance classification accuracy and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online)Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207