An Explainable AI-Based Modified YOLOv8 Model for Efficient Fire Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early fire detection is the key to saving lives and limiting property damage. Advanced technology can detect fires in high-risk zones with minimal human presence before they escalate beyond control. This study focuses on providing a more advanced model structure based on the YOLOv8 architecture to enhance early recognition of fire. Although YOLOv8 is excellent at real-time object detection, it can still be better adjusted to the nuances of fire detection. We achieved this advancement by incorporating an additional context-to-flow layer, enabling the YOLOv8 model to more effectively capture both local and global contextual information. The context-to-flow layer enhances the model’s ability to recognize complex patterns like smoke and flames, leading to more effective feature extraction. This extra layer helps the model better detect fires and smoke by improving its ability to focus on fine-grained details and minor variation, which is crucial in challenging environments with low visibility, dynamic fire behavior, and complex backgrounds. Our proposed model achieved a 2.9% greater precision rate, 4.7% more recall rate, and 4% more F1-score in comparison to the YOLOv8 default model. This study discovered that the architecture modification increases information flow and improves fire detection at all fire sizes, from tiny sparks to massive flames. We also included explainable AI strategies to explain the model’s decision-making, thus adding more transparency and improving trust in its predictions. Ultimately, this enhanced system demonstrates remarkable efficacy and accuracy, which allows additional improvements in autonomous fire detection systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".