Millimeter-Wave Far-Field Range Antenna Measurement System for a W-Band Monopulse Antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a millimeter-wave far-field range antenna measurement system is proposed for W-band monopulse antenna measurements. Since the W-band monopulse antenna installed in radar systems has many input/output ports, multiple calculations are required to measure all the ports. We propose a system structure capable of the simultaneous measurement of multiple channels to quickly and accurately measure the performance of a monopulse antenna. The proposed measurement system includes a multi-channel rotary joint, a pair of diplexers, and multiple vector network analyzer extenders. In addition, an RF sub-system is implemented to reliably measure the phase of the W-band radiation pattern. It utilizes a shared local oscillator source and external power amplifiers for the transmit and receive paths. Employing the proposed multi-channel antenna measurement system, the sum/difference channels of a monopulse antenna were simultaneously measured according to the azimuth angle. In addition, a comparison of the far-field measurements provided by the proposed system and the near-field measurements was conducted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".