Linear Free Energy Relationships Associated with Hydride Transfer From [(6,6′-R<sub>2</sub>-bpy)Re(CO)<sub>3</sub>H]: A Cautionary Tale in Identifying Hydrogen Bonding Effects in the Secondary Coordination Sphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six rhenium hydride complexes, [(6,6′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, R = OEt, OMe, NHMe, Me, F, Br), were synthesized. These complexes insert CO 2 to form rhenium formate complexes of the type [(6,6′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 {OC(O)H}]. All the rhenium formate species were characterized using X-ray crystallography, which revealed that the bpy ligand is not coplanar with the metal coordination plane containing the two nitrogen donors of the bpy ligand but tilted. A solid-state structure of [(6,6′-Me 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] determined using MicroED also featured a tilted bpy ligand. The kinetics of CO 2 insertion into complexes of the type [(6,6′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] were measured experimentally and the thermodynamic hydricities of [(6,6′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] species were determined using theoretical calculations. A Brønsted plot constructed using the experimentally determined rate constants for CO 2 insertion and the calculated thermodynamic hydricities for [(6,6′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] revealed a linear free energy relationship (LFER) between thermodynamic and kinetic hydricity. This LFER is different to the previously determined relationship for CO 2 insertion into complexes of the type [(4,4′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H]. At a given thermodynamic hydricity, CO 2 insertion is faster for complexes containing a 6,6′-substituted bpy ligand. This is likely in part due to the tilting observed for systems with 6,6′-substituted bpy ligands. Notably, the 6,6′-(NHMe) 2 -bpy ligand could in principle stabilize the transition state for CO 2 insertion via hydrogen bonding. This work shows that if only the rate of CO 2 insertion into [(6,6′-(NHMe) 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] is compared to [(4,4′-R 2 -bpy)Re(CO) 3 H] systems, the increase in rate could be easily attributed to hydrogen bonding, but in fact all 6,6′-substituted systems lead to faster than expected rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".