MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402998116 · doi:10.1155/2024/2381582

Ocular Biometric and Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Former Preterm Children: A Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4402998116 on OpenAlex
Marzieh Najjaran, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam, Abbasali Yekta, Nasser Shoeibi, Armin Hemmati, Mojtaba Abrishami, Saeed Akhlaghi, Mohammed Ziaei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
FundersMashhad University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityGestational ageOphthalmologyCohortVisual acuityOptical coherence tomographyFull TermRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsPregnancySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose . To compare biometric and optical coherence tomography parameters as well as refractive status in preterm children aged 4–8 years with or without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and evaluate their correlations with age and gender‐matched full‐term children. Methods . Retrospective comparative cohort study of four groups of children. Children with a history of preterm birth, including ROP who received intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) treatment, children with a history of ROP that regressed without treatment and those with no history of ROP were compared to age and gender‐matched full‐term children as a control group. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent of refraction (SE), macular and choroidal thickness, as well as biometric parameters was measured. Results . A total of 120 eyes of 120 children (30 children in each group) were included. There was no significant difference in BCVA, SE, and subjective cylinder between groups ( p = 0.05, p = 0.3, p = 0.6, respectively). Axial length was significantly shorter, and the cornea was steeper in both ROP groups than in other groups ( p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The central macular thickness was significantly thicker in the treated, regressed ROP and preterm groups than in full‐term children ( p < 0.001). The gestational age was negatively correlated with macular thickness in both treated and regressed ROP groups ( r = −0.517; p = 0.003, r = − 0.490; p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions . Children with a history of ROP had a shorter axial length, steeper cornea, and thicker macula that correlated with lower gestational age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it