Effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in animal models of Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor symptoms due to loss of brain dopamine and non-motor symptoms, including gastrointestinal disorders. Although there is no cure for PD, symptomatic treatments are available. L-Dopa is the gold standard PD therapy, but most patients develop dyskinesias (LID), which are challenging to manage. Amantadine is recognized as the most effective drug for LID, but its adverse effects limit the use in patients. Here we review how 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), drugs used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and alopecia, exhibit beneficial effects in PD animal models. 5ARIs show neuroprotective properties in brain and gut dopaminergic systems, and reduce dyskinesias in rodent model of PD. Additionally, the 5ARI finasteride dampened dopaminergic-induced drug gambling in PD patients. Neuroprotection and antidyskinetic activities of 5ARIs in animal models of PD suggest their potential repurposing in men with PD to address gut dysfunction, protect brain DA and inhibit dyskinesias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".