Inflammatory pain resolution by mouse serum-derived small extracellular vesicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Extensively characterized sEVs from SNI model mice serum. • Detected endogenous leu-enkephalin in serum sEVs. • Prophylactic sEVs accelerated recovery from inflammatory pain. • Immune cell alterations probed by ChipCytometry and flow cytometry. Current treatments for chronic pain have limited efficacy and significant side effects, warranting research on alternative strategies for pain management. One approach involves using small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), or exosomes, to transport beneficial biomolecular cargo to aid pain resolution. Exosomes are 30–150 nm sEVs that can be beneficial or harmful depending on their source and cargo composition. We report a comprehensive multi-modal analysis of different aspects of sEV characterization, miRNAs, and protein markers across sEV sources. To investigate the short- and long-term effects of mouse serum-derived sEVs in pain modulation, sEVs from naïve control or spared nerve injury (SNI) model male donor mice were injected intrathecally into naïve male recipient mice. These sEVs transiently increased basal mechanical thresholds, an effect mediated by opioid signaling as this outcome was blocked by naltrexone. Mass spectrometry of sEVs detected endogenous opioid peptide leu-enkephalin. sEVs from naïve female mice have higher levels of leu-enkephalin compared to male, matching the analgesic onset of leu-enkephalin in male recipient mice. In investigating the long-term effect of sEVs, we observed that a single prophylactic intrathecal injection of sEVs two weeks prior to induction of the pain model in recipient mice accelerated recovery from inflammatory pain after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection. Our exploratory studies examining immune cell populations in spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion using ChipCytometry suggested alterations in immune cell populations 14 days post-CFA. Flow cytometry confirmed increases in CD206 + macrophages in the spinal cord in sEV-treated mice. Collectively, these studies demonstrate multiple mechanisms by which sEVs can attenuate pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".