Corneal Epithelial Hyperplasia Related to Chronic Eye Rubbing Mimicking Keratoconus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: We report a case of corneal epithelial hyperplasia associated with chronic eye rubbing mimicking keratoconus. A 32-year-old man was presented with a 3-year history of suboptimal vision and astigmatism in his left eye. His history was significant for chronic left eye rubbing. The anterior corneal curvature map showed inferior steepening in the left eye; however, other features of ectasia were absent. Corneal epithelium thickness mapping with optical coherence tomography was significant for corresponding epithelial thickening. His corneal imaging remained stable at a 6-month follow-up examination. At month 15-and after cessation of eye rubbing behavior-the vision symptoms, refraction, and corneal imaging had normalized. In conclusion, chronic eye rubbing may cause reversible corneal epithelial hypertrophy. Eye rubbing should be considered in the evaluation of patients presenting with unexplained vision symptoms and changes in astigmatism that are not consistent with ectasia on corneal imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".