MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403021640 · doi:10.52294/001c.123347

The Douglas-Bell Canada Brain Bank Post-mortem Brain Imaging Protocol

2024· article· en· W4403021640 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mahsa Dadar, Liana Guerra Sanches, Jérémie P. Fouquet, Roqaie Moqadam, Zaki Alasmar, Ilana R. Leppert, Dominique Mirault, Josefina Maranzano, Naguib Mechawar, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Yashar Zeighami

Bibliographic record

VenueAperture Neuro · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsProtocol (science)NeuroscienceMedicinePsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable non-invasive tool that has been widely used for in vivo investigations of brain morphometry and microstructural characteristics. Post-mortem MRIs can provide complementary anatomical and microstructural information to in vivo imaging and ex vivo neuropathological assessments without compromising the sample for future investigations. We have developed a post-mortem MRI protocol for the brain specimens of the Douglas-Bell Canada Brain Bank (DBCBB), the largest brain bank in Canada housing over 3000 neurotypical and diseased brain specimens, that allows for acquisition of high-resolution 3T and 7T MRIs. Our protocol can be used to scan DBCBB specimens with minimal tissue manipulation, allowing for feasibly scanning large numbers of post-mortem specimens while retaining the quality of the tissue for downstream histology and immunohistochemistry assessments. We demonstrate the robustness of this protocol despite the dependency of image quality on fixation by acquiring data on the first day of extraction and fixation, to over twenty years post fixation. The acquired images can be used to perform volumetric segmentations, cortical thickness measurements, and quantitative analyses which can be potentially used to link MRI-derived and ex vivo histological measures, assaying both the normative organization of the brain and ex vivo measures of pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAperture NeuroSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207