Impact of varying soil conditions on the design of tall building foundations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Above the past two decades, there has been a significant rise in the construction of tall structures over 150m in height, with an almost exponential development rate. Numerous similar structures have been built throughout the Middle East and Asia, and many more are proposed or now under development. Buildings over 300m in height are posing new engineering difficulties, especially in terms of structural and geotechnical design. Wind analysis is critical when it comes to big structures. Geotechnical engineers, in particular, are progressively abandoning empirical techniques in favor of state-of-the-art methods when designing foundations for super-tall structures. Numerous studies have investigated the structural behavior of tall structures with SSI by taking into account a variety of factors such as foundation type, soil conditions, lateral stresses, and the ratio of the flexural stiffness of the beam and column. Very few studies on the soil-structure interaction of tall structures in clayey soil conditions, especially in Indian seismic zones, have been conducted. In zone III, a G+18-story rectangular structure with a 3 m floor-to-floor height was assessed using the E-tabs software. The selected plan is rectangular in shape. The structure has been evaluated for static and dynamic wind and seismic forces. Structures have been developed for use in circumstances of hard, medium, and soft soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it