MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403038105 · doi:10.22543/0090-0222.2475

A Five-Year Study of the Ground-Dwelling Beetles (Coleoptera) from a Grassland and an Adjacent Woods in Southern Québec (Canada)

2024· article· en· W4403038105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Levesque, Gilles-Yvon Levesque

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Great Lakes Entomologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrasslandGeographyEcologyForestryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present results of the first long-term study on spatiotemporal variations in the composition and structure of ground-dwelling beetle assemblages from a grassland and adjacent woods in eastern Canada. It is the third part of an investigation on the beetle biodiversity using diverse methods between 2006 and 2012. During the entire snow-free season (April/May to October) in 2006–2010, we collected by pitfall trapping 67694 individuals representing 386 Coleoptera species and morphospecies belonging to 35 families in southern Québec. Adventive species represented at least 51.9% of individuals. Carabidae and Staphylinidae were the most abundant families and had the highest species richness in all seven pitfall trap lines (two lines in a grassland, one line at the edge of the woods, two lines in the woods, and two lines near a ditch parallel to the woods). We did not detect a trend in annual variations of total catches and species richness in each pitfall trap line. A large part of the species (42.2%) occurred as singletons or doubletons over all sampling months. We collected at least 100 individuals for 50 species, including four eudominant species: Tachinus limbatus Melsheimer (14.0% of the total catches), Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) (10.5%), Drusilla canaliculata (Fabricius) (9.6%) and Anotylus rugosus (Fabricius) (5.3%). Over all sampling years, between 49 and 63% of species from one pitfall trap line were sporadically collected (i.e., during one to three months only over five years), whereas only a few species were active during at least 26 months over all the 33 sampling months in each pitfall trap line. Fourteen species were dominant in at least one pitfall trap line; we observed strong year-to-year fluctuations in the relative abundance of dominant and subdominant species in each line, and spatiotemporal variations of each of these species. We determined the sex-ratio for 42 abundant species, including 17 species with a female biased sex-ratio, and 13 species with a predominance of males. Adults of the most abundant species were mostly macropterous (73% of catches), and we discuss on their dispersal power by flight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Great Lakes EntomologistSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207