The Prevalence and Impact of Migraine Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Migraine is a primary headache disorder and one of the most common causes of disability worldwide. Prior reports showed a higher prevalence of migraine among physicians. We conducted this study to estimate the prevalence of migraine among physicians in Saudi Arabia, as well as its impact on quality of life. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated online questionnaire that was distributed among physicians in various medical and surgical specialties in Saudi Arabia from January to June 2023. The inclusion criteria involved physicians in all specialties, who worked in governmental or private hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Employed or healthcare workers other than physicians were excluded. To measure the impact of headache on a person's quality of life, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) test was applied. Statistical analysis of the study was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results We had 387 respondents, of whom 362 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 33.02 ± 9.07 years, and genders were distributed equally. Most physicians worked in departments of internal medicine, family medicine, general practice, and general surgery. The prevalence of migraine was recorded in 17.1% (62 patients) of all the included participants, with a female predominance. MIDAS revealed a total mean score of 16.823±14.149. The severity grades were classified as moderate (37.1%), severe (35.5%), or little to no (21.0%). Stress and light were cited as the top factors that trigger or worsen migraine, while sleep, rest, and quiet and darknesswere cited as the top relieving factors. The average number of headache attacks (month) was 6.823. Most patients with migraine were board residents (27.4%), living in the western region (53.2%), and working in a governmental hospital (38.7%). Conclusion Migraine is a common disorder among physicians in Saudi Arabia, with significant moderate-to-severe disability. Stress is identified as a major trigger. Proper awareness, stress management programs, and therapeutic intervention may mitigate the untoward consequences of migraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".