MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403054477 · doi:10.26443/arc.v51i1.1460

Embodying Transnational Yoga: Eating, Singing, and Breathing in Transformation, by Christopher Jain Miller

2024· article· en· W4403054477 on OpenAlexaff
Katie Khatereh Taher

Bibliographic record

VenueArc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerSingingPsychologyPsychoanalysisArtPsychotherapistManagementEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Embodying Transnational Yoga: Eating, Singing, and Breathing in Transformation, Christopher Jain Miller examines the significance of food, music, and breathing practices within transnational yoga communities.To explore these themes, which Miller suggests are understudied within Yoga Studies, the book offers an ethnographic account of three communities: Gurani Anjali's Yoga Anand Ashram in Long Island, New York; Polestar Gardens, located on the Big Island of Hawaii, which follows the teachings of Paramahansa Yogananda; and Swami Kuvalayananda's Kaivalyadhama Yoga Institute in Lonavala, Maharashtra.The book uses the phrase "transnational yoga communities" to emphasize the interconnected nature of the practice, showcasing the convergence of various ideas and practices in diverse global settings.By examining these communities, Miller illustrates that, in line with the prevailing cliché in popular yoga culture, "yoga is more than just the postures" (1).Throughout the book, Miller emphasizes the importance of taking an approach that is simultaneously critical and sympathetic, and encourages future scholars to embrace a similar perspective.The text acknowledges potential objections that may arise to the sympathetic approach, especially given the increasing focus on guru abuse and legal allegations within contemporary yoga communities.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArc The Journal of the School of Religious StudiesSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207