High Affinity Inhibitors of the Macrophage Infectivity Potentiator Protein from <i>Trypanosoma cruzi</i>, <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>, and <i>Legionella pneumophila</i>─A Comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Since Chagas disease, melioidosis, and Legionnaires’ disease are all potentially life-threatening infections, there is an urgent need for new treatment strategies. All causative agents, Trypanosoma cruzi, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Legionella pneumophila, express a virulence factor, the macrophage infectivity potentiator (MIP) protein, emerging as a promising new therapeutic target. Inhibition of MIP proteins having a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity leads to reduced viability, proliferation, and cell invasion. The affinity of a series of pipecolic acid-type MIP inhibitors was evaluated against all MIPs using a fluorescence polarization assay. The analysis of structure–activity relationships led to highly active inhibitors of MIPs of all pathogens, characterized by a one-digit nanomolar affinity for the MIPs and a very effective inhibition of their peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity. Docking studies, molecular dynamics simulations, and quantum mechanical calculations suggest an extended σ-hole of the meta -halogenated phenyl sulfonamide to be responsible for the high affinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".