The genome of <i>Gallaecimonas pentaromativorans</i> strain 10A, isolated from a Pacific oyster, reveals the potential for hydrocarbon degradation and CRISPR-Cas defense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bacteria in the genus Gallaecimonas are known for their ability to breakdown complex hydrocarbons, making them of particular ecological and biotechnological significance. However, few species have been isolated to date, and their ecological distribution has yet to be examined. Here, we report a novel bacterium in the genus Gallaecimonas , designated as G. pentaromativorans strain 10A, which was isolated from a Pacific oyster ( Magallana gigas , a.k.a. Crassostrea gigas ) collected from a farm experiencing a mass mortality event in British Columbia, Canada. G. pentaromativorans strain 10A is a rod-shaped, motile bacterium and has a circular genome of 4,322,156 bp encoding 3,928 protein-coding sequences (CDS). Phylogenetic analysis showed that strain 10A is closely related to members of G. pentaromativorans. Like other Gallaecimonas members, strain 10A harbours specific pathways involved in degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and xenobiotic compounds, producing biosurfactants, and assimilating nitrate and sulfate; however, it is uniquely equipped with an additional 166 genes belonging to 147 protein families, including a putative higB - higA that likely contributes to enhanced stress response. Strain 10A also possesses clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems (CRISPR-Cas), prevalent in Gallaecimonas (detected in three out of four species), implying a potential defense mechanism against exogenous mobile genetic elements such as plasmids and viruses. We also mined publicly available databases to establish the widespread distribution of bacteria in the genus Gallaecimonas in seawater, sediments, and freshwater across latitude, suggesting its versatility and importance to environmental processes. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that the genome of Gallaecimonas pentaromativorans strain 10A, isolated from a diseased Pacific oyster, encodes for a suite of putative functions, including oil degradation, xenobiotic breakdown, biosurfactants production, assimilatory nitrate and sulfate reduction, and viral defense. This plasticity and breadth in metabolic function help to explain the cosmopolitan distribution of members of this genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".