MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403064483 · doi:10.1186/s40538-024-00672-z

Enhancing selenium biofortification: strategies for improving soil-to-plant transfer

2024· article· en· W4403064483 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Liao, Ying Xing, Ao‐Mei Li, Jiang Ze-pu, Yongxian Liu, Dongliang Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiofortificationSeleniumPlant scienceBiotechnologyPlant biochemistryBiologyEnvironmental scienceAgronomyChemistryBotanyMicronutrientGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium (Se) is one of the essential trace elements for humans. Plants are the main source of Se for humans, while soil Se is the primary source of Se for plants. Biofortification, which involves the transfer of Se from soil to plants and animals, is currently recognized as the safest and most effective approach for Se supplementation for humans. However, Se in soil primarily exists in forms that plants cannot easily utilize, so enhancing Se transfer from soil to plants is crucial for optimal Se utilization. In this paper, we provided a comprehensive analysis of Se forms in soil. Then we summarized the strategies for enhancing Se transfer from soil to plants. These strategies include adjusting redox potential, managing soil moisture, modulating pH value, improving organic matter, optimizing ion competition, promoting beneficial microbes, and considering the synergy between plant rhizosphere and soil. Furthermore, we reviewed Se forms and metabolism after uptake into plants to better understand its role in human health. Finally, we came up with the challenges and perspectives, to provide new insights for further study in this area. This work also offers potential solutions for enhancing Se transformation from soil to plants and utilizing soil Se to produce naturally Se-rich products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical and Biological Technologies in AgricultureSame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207