MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403067058 · doi:10.5419/bjpg2024-0010

KINETIC STUDY OF ESTERIFICATION CATALYZED WITH ALUMINUM SULFATE AIMED AT CONVERTING LEVULINIC ACID INTO METHYL LEVULINATE

2024· article· en· W4403067058 on OpenAlexaff
Lívia Silva, P. P. Silva, Eduardo Lins de Barros Neto, Ricardo Paulo Fonsêca Melo, Francisco Wendell Bezerra Lopes, Lindemberg J. N. Duarte, Paula Fabiane Pinheiro do Nascimento

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsLevulinic acidCatalysisChemistrySulfateAluminiumOrganic chemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recycling lignocellulosic biomass is a sustainable alternative to the petrochemical industry since it allows the production of valuable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly chemical products, such as levulinic acid (LVA) and levulinate esters. Methyl levulinate (MLV), for example, has been assessed as a fuel additive with low toxicity, high lubricity, and flash point stability. In this respect, the present investigation details a kinetic study of methyl esterification catalyzed with aluminum sulfate aimed at converting levulinic acid into methyl levulinate. The reactions were carried out in a Parr Instruments stainless steel reactor to assess the effect of temperature (120, 140 and 160 °C) and reaction time (30, 60, 120 and 180 min) on LVA conversion into MLV, maintaining a constant LVA:methanol ratio of 1:8 and aluminum sulfate catalyst concentration of 0.04 mol.L-1. The maximum LVA-MLV conversion of 93.04 % was obtained at a temperature of 160 °C and reaction time of 60 minutes. The pseudo first-order kinetic model exhibited the best fit to the experimental data, with correlation coefficients (R²) greater than 0.96, and it was used to calculate activation energy, obtaining a value of 10.19 kcal.mol-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Petroleum and GasSame topicInorganic and Organometallic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207