MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403072172 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.051

A-051 Validation and Implementation of the Stanbio Beta-Hydroxybutyrate Assay on Roche c502 Analyzer

2024· article· en· W4403072172 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Nogier, J. Kalra, Shan Lu, Fe‐Lin Lin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrum analyzerBETA (programming language)ChromatographyChemistryComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background β-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB) serves as a crucial biomarker in assessing, managing, and monitoring ketosis in various clinical scenarios, such as diabetic ketoacidosis and instances of alcohol abuse combined with starvation. This study aimed to validate a βOHB assay (Stanbio Laboratory) conducted on a Roche Cobas c502 analyzer and establish performance specifications. Additionally, we conducted a method comparison for three assays: Randox D-3-Hydroxybutyrate (Ranbut) assay on Roche c501 analyzer, Abbott Freestyle Precision B-Ketone strip point-of-care test, and the Stanbio Laboratory β-Hydroxybutyrate LiquiColor assay on Roche c502 analyzer. Methods Precision, linearity, limit of quantification (LOQ), method comparison, and sample stability were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, using commercial quality control materials (Randox Multisera) and residual patient samples (Lithium heparin anti-coagulated plasma). The reference interval was verified by residual samples from 20 healthy individuals (normal blood glucose, HbA1c, liver enzymes, and lipid panel results). Statistical analysis was performed by EP-Evaluator (v12). Results Intra-assay and total coefficient of variation (CV) were determined as 0% and 2.4% at 0.3 and 1.21 mmol/L, respectively. The linearity range of the assay was verified from 0.0 to 9.0 mmol/L. Using CV < 20% as criteria, the functional sensitivity (LOQ) was 0.10 mmol/L at least. Lithium heparin anti-coagulated plasma specimens were stable for 24 hours at room temperature or seven days at 4 - 8 ̊C. The manufacturer’s reference interval was verified as 0.00 - 0.40 mmol/L. The Stanbio βOHB assay on the Roche c502 analyzer demonstrated a strong agreement with the Randox D-3-Hydroxybutyrate assay on the Roche c501 analyzer with a slope of 1.053 (95% CI: 1.037, 1.070) and intercept of -0.005 (95% CI: -0.068, 0.059) (coefficient correlation R = 0.9992). A positive bias was observed compared to the Abbott Freestyle Precision B-Ketone strip POC test (mean bias = + 0.50 mmol/L; slope = 1.630, 95% CI: 1.404, 1.857; R = 0.9184), and this discrepancy occurred particularly at βOHB > 5.5 mmol/L measured by Abbott method. Conclusions The Standbio βOHB assay exhibited excellent precision and linearity across a brand range of concentrations. This assay strongly agrees with the Randox assay run on a similar instrument but discordance with Abbott’s POCT method at high βOHB concentration. Overall, the validated method provides a reliable and efficient means for measuring βOHB levels on a Roche chemistry analyzer, facilitating accurate diagnosis and monitoring of ketosis-related conditions in clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207