MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403072192 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.506

B-146 Unlocking the potential of large-cohort proteomics studies with the Orbitrap Astral mass platform

2024· article· en· W4403072192 on OpenAlexaff
Xuan Yu, Anna Pashkova, Mark Zeller, Christopher Wirth, James G. Grote, Tabiwang N. Arrey, Eugen Damoc, B. J. 't Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsThermo Fisher Scientific (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrbitrapProteomicsComputational biologyBiologyChemistryMass spectrometryChromatographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Large-cohort proteomics analysis using mass spectrometry is a powerful approach to discover and validate new biomarkers. In combination with clinical data and computational analysis, large-cohort proteomics study brings opportunities in improving early diagnosis, refining patient stratification, and predicting/monitoring treatment response. Yet, to achieve meaningful biological insights in large-cohort studies, robust, reproducible, and comprehensive proteome profiling in a high-throughput manner still remains challenging. Here, we use a high-resolution accurate mass (HRAM) Oribtrap Astral platform to enable high-quality and robust protein quantification across thousands of LC-MS/MS analyses. With a throughput of 100 samples/day, we can reproducibly profile ∼9000 proteins from human cell line and ∼800 proteins from undepleted plasma across multiple instruments and more than 10 consecutive days in a 24/7 operation mode. Methods Experiments were performed on multiple Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometers with and without FAIMS Pro interface. Chromatographic separations were performed using a trap/elute method on Vanquish Neo system at a 11-minute gradient and a flow rate of 1ul/min, resulting in a throughput of 100 samples/day. Undepleted plasma digest was analyzed in a 24/7 mode for > 1000 injections on each LC-MS/MS setup. In addition, HeLa digest as quality control (QC) was analyzed every 12hours. The Oribtrap Astral platform was operated in data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode using a full scan with m/z 380-980, and DIA MS/MS scans with an isolation window of 2Th. Resulting DIA raw files were automatically transferred and processed using Chimerys in a beta version of Proteome Discoverer software. Results Multiple LC-MS/MS systems were operated in DIA mode either with or without FAIMS Pro device in a 24/7 operation mode at a throughput of 100SPD. Undepleted plasma digest was analyzed with >1000 injections on each LC-MS/MS setup. To monitor the baseline performance, HeLa digest served as QC were analyzed periodically every 12 hours with 3 technical replicates each time. To effectively manage and analyze these thousands of data files generated, we developed an automated data transfer and analysis pipeline. Automatically, the resulting DIA raw data files were immediately transferred to a server, then processed by state-of-the-art intelligent search algorithm Chimerys. Benefiting from the ultra-high scan speed of up to 200Hz on the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer, a much narrower isolation window width of 2Th was applied in the DIA method, comparing to 10-20Th on the classic DIA method. As a result, ∼9000 proteins from HeLa digest and ∼800 proteins from undepleted plasma digest were identified within only a 11-minutes gradient, respectively. More than 80% of the plasma proteins were reproducibly identified and quantified from all the runs on each LC-MS/MS setup, indicating a great reproducibility from run-to-run longitudinally. Stable and robust peptide quantitation was observed by extracting peptides with high, medium, and low abundant across the runs. Importantly, QC showed no performance degradation throughout the entire study, indicating high robustness of the entire LC-MS/MS setup. Conclusions Orbitrap Astral mass platform can comprehensively analyze the proteome of >1000s of sample robustly and reproducibly in a high-throughput manner, addressing the needs in large-cohort studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207