Experimental Study on the Impact of Sorption-Desorption on Nitrate Isotopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitrate pollution is a global environmental problem, and mean nitrate levels have risen by an estimated 36% in global waterways since 1990. Tracing nitrate sources is important for water quality management, and nitrate isotopes (δ15N-NO3− and δ18O-NO3−) are commonly used for this purpose because of the different isotopic compositions of different sources. However, the impact of nitrate sorption on matrix and desorption from matrix on N and O isotopic composition of nitrate in liquid phase has not been well clarified. To explore the mechanism for the changes in nitrate concentration and isotopes in liquid phase during sorption and desorption, this study took a shale sample (enriched in clay minerals and commonly exposed in the Earth), conducted a series of laboratory experiments for nitrate sorption and desorption, and studied the impact of sorption and desorption on nitrate N and O isotopic composition in liquid phase. The results showed that the shale sample exhibited a rapid sorption and desorption rate for nitrate in the surface water samples, with the nitrate concentration in the solution decreasing from 14.3 mg/L to 4.1 mg/L within 5 min. The sorption data fit the Langmuir model better than that of the Freundlich model. The maximum possible sorption (Qmax) for the shale sample was estimated to be 46 μg/g. Preliminary laboratory experiments showed that changes in δ15N-NO3− values were not obvious, and changes in δ18O-NO3− values in liquid phase were minor during sorption and desorption of the shale sample, suggesting that nitrogen isotopic fractionation can be neglected, and the sorption of nitrate by the shale sample has a very limited impact on the distribution of nitrate isotopes in liquid phase. However, the impact of nitrate desorption on the nitrate isotopes in liquid phase depends on the isotopic composition of exchangeable nitrate in the solid phase, which may be related to antecedent water–rock interactions. This study provides important information for elucidating the evolution mechanism of nitrate and its isotopic compositions following sorption-desorption, and is conducive to revealing the nitrogen cycle law in the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".