MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403072806 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.323

A-329 Accuracy of the pH, <i>P</i>O2, and <i>P</i>CO2 Tests in the <i>i-STAT® G3+</i> Cartridge Using the <i>i-STAT 1 System</i> for Venous, Arterial and Capillary Whole Blood Specimens in Clinical Settings

2024· article· en· W4403072806 on OpenAlexaff
S F Kornfeld, M Gonzalez Aguirre, Osama A. Mohammed, S Kovacevic, H. R. Zhang, Michael K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
FundersAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsstatCartridgeChemistryMaterials scienceBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Precise and accurate measurements of blood gases are important for the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of respiratory, metabolic, and acid-base disturbances. This study demonstrates the accuracy of the pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) tests in the i-STAT G3+ cartridge with the i-STAT 1 System in arterial, venous, and capillary whole blood specimens in point of care or clinical laboratory settings. Methods The accuracy of the PO2, and PCO2 tests in the i-STAT G3+ cartridge was assessed at external clinical sites in a method comparison study using whole blood specimens across the measurement range for each test: pH 6.5-7.8, PO2 5-700 mmHg, PCO2 5.0-130.0 mmHg. Specimens used in this study were venous, arterial, and capillary specimens prospectively collected under Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent or were leftover de-identified venous or arterial specimens. The study included venous and arterial whole blood samples from ∼140 adult subjects (≥ 18 years) at 3 clinical sites, and capillary whole blood samples from ∼180 adult subject at 3 clinicals sites and ∼25 neonate subjects (birth to 28 days) at 2 clinical sites. The RapidPoint System was used as comparator. For venous and arterial whole blood, samples were collected and tested in duplicate on the i-STAT G3+ cartridge and in singlicate on the RapidPoint System. For capillary whole blood samples, adult fingerstick samples and neonate heel-stick samples were collected in capillary tubes and tested in singlicate on the i-STAT G3+ cartridge and on the RapidPoint System. Passing-Bablok regression was performed for venous and arterial whole blood samples combined, using the first replicate from the i-STAT G3+ cartridge versus the singlicate result from the comparator, and for capillary whole blood samples (adult and neonate combined) using the singlicate result from the i-STAT G3+ cartridge versus the singlicate result from the comparator. Results Passing-Bablok regression of i-STAT G3+ cartridge results versus the comparator was used to calculate slope and correlation coefficient (r). For adult venous and arterial whole blood results, pH had slope = 0.96 and r = 0.99, PO2 had slope = 1.05 and r = 1.00, and PCO2 had slope = 1.04 and r = 0.98. For adult and neonate capillary whole blood results, pH had slope = 1.02 and r = 0.98, PO2 had slope = 1.09 and r = 0.99, and PCO2 had slope = 1.07 and r = 0.96. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the i-STAT 1 System delivers accurate pH, PO2, and PCO2 test results with ∼2 minutes using the i-STAT G3+ cartridge for venous, arterial and capillary whole blood samples for adult and neonate subjects when tested by end-users in a point of care or clinical laboratory setting. This study was funded by Abbott Laboratories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207