MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analytical Solutions for a Nonlinear Quadratic Delayed Functional Integral Inclusion With Feedback Control on the Real Half-Line

2024· article· en· W4403073971 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. M. A. El‐Sayed, Nesreen F. M. El-haddad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInclusion (mineral)Quadratic equationNonlinear systemLine (geometry)Control (management)Control theory (sociology)Feedback controlCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsGeometryComputer scienceEngineeringPsychologyControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceMedicineSocial psychologyOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let E be a reflexive Banach space. In this research, we are interested in the solvability of the nonlinear quadratic delayed functional integral inclusion (NQDFII) with a feedback control condition on the real half-axis. Our examination is found within the space BC(R+, E) of bounded continuous functions on the real half-axis R+ and takes values in a reflexive Banach space E beneath the assumption that the set-valued function G satisfy Lipschitz condition in E. The base we depend on in this study is the procedure related to a measure of noncompactness in the space BC(R+, E) by a given norm of continuity and applying Darbo’s fixed point theorem. Moreover, the asymptotic stability of the solution and the asymptotic dependency of the solution on the set of selections SG will be examined. Also, we give an example to illustrate the adequacy and esteem of our comes about.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207