MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403083982 · doi:10.60076/indotech.v2i2.660

Kandang Ayam Pintar Berbasis Internet of Thinks Menggunakan NodeMCU ESP8266

2024· article· id· W4403083982 on OpenAlexaff
Muktashim Billah, Marto Sihombing, Rahmadani Rahmadani

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Journal of Education And Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetComputer graphics (images)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perancangan perangkat kandang ayam pintar berbasis IoT. Sistem perangkat ini menggunakan mikrokontroler NodeMCU ESP8266 yang berfungsi sebagai pengolah data dan pengirim perintah dan juga sebagai penerima jaringan WI-FI. Sistem perangkat kendang ayam pintar ini menggunakan system kontrol menggunakan smartphone android untuk mengontrol dan memonitoring keadaan, kendang ayam pintar ini menggunakan system komunikasi jaringan WI-FI sehingga sistem kendang ayam dan smartphone android dapat terhubung, dalam system kendang ayam pintar ini menggunakan sensor dht11 sebagai pengontrol suhu yang ada di dalam kendang ayam, dan motor servo sebagai penggerak penutup pakan ayam. Supply tegangan yang di gunakan oleh alat ini adalah AC-DC colokan listrik rumah untuk di hububgkan ke lampu, sumber tegangan yang di butuhkan pompa air 5volt. Tegangan AC-DC masuk terlebih dahulu ke rangkaian relay, 5 volt tengangan untuk menghidupkan pompa air. Alat ini dapat diguanakan dengan mudah untuk membantu kegiatan manusia dalam memelihara ayam hanya dengan menggunakan smartphone dan di hubungkan ke WI-FI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndonesian Journal of Education And Computer ScienceSame topicDecision Support System ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207