MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403088435 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2023-0690

Observation and evaluation of soil stratum deformation in reclamation area under ocean tides

2024· article· en· W4403088435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinghong Wu, Shaowen Xu, Bin Shi, Kai Gu, Gang Cheng, Lixiang Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil, Finite Element Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratumLand reclamationGeologyGeotechnical engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Environmental scienceOceanographyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reclamation areas in coastal regions serve as primary human settlements, where groundwater undergoes fluctuations due to changes in ocean tides, resulting in deformation variations within the soil stratum. In this paper, the UWFBGs (ultra-weak fiber Bragg grating arrays) technique with micro strain accuracy and meter-scale resolution was used to investigate the soil stratum strain under ocean tidal effects. Through observations made at a borehole in Yushan Island, Zhoushan, China, semi-diurnal and spring-neap cycles of soil stratum deformation were identified, and the main influencing factor for soil tidal intensity within borehole depth was further analyzed. The concept of "soil stratum tidal strain energy density" was proposed to quantify the extent of soil deformation influenced by ocean tidal effects and four levels were divided to evaluate the borehole stratum. The results were of great importance for precise monitoring of soil deformation, and analysis of subsidence characteristics in reclamation areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil, Finite Element MethodsFrench-language works237,207