Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stokes’s second problem is reconsidered for three models of complex fluids: an elasto-viscoplastic fluid, a thixotropic viscoplastic fluid and a discontinuously shear-thickening fluid. In each case, the Stokes-layer dynamics is interrogated with a view to examining the signatures of the detailed rheology. Significant deformations are possible below the yield stress for elasto-viscoplastic fluids as a result of the excitation of elastic waves, particularly near resonances. Thixotropic fluids with viscosity bifurcations layer internally, but surface-speed signatures mostly appear similar to those for simple yield-stress fluids. Stokes-layer oscillations of discontinuous shear thickening fluids can prompt abrupt increases in viscosity, introducing sudden jumps in surface speed. Pre-existing experimental results for layers of kaolin slurries in a motorized, oscillating tray are reconsidered and compared with the results for elasto-viscoplastic and thixotropic fluids. • Stokes layers of three model fluids are explored. • Elasto-viscoplastic fluids deform significantly if elastic waves become excited. • Thixotropic fluids layer internally through viscosity bifurcations. • Discontinuous shear-thickening fluids jam during Stokes-layer oscillations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".