Peroxy-Carbenium Mediated Asymmetric Synthesis of 1,2-Dioxanes and 1,2-Dioxolanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The endoperoxide scaffold is found in numerous natural products and synthetic substances with pharmaceutical interest. The principal challenge to their synthetic access remains the preparation of chiral compounds, due to the weakness of the peroxide bond, which limits the scope of available or applicable methods. Here, we demonstrate how peroxycarbenium species can be trapped by silylated nucleophiles with high enantioselectivities, and diastereoselectivities when applicable, using a chiral imidophosphorimidate (IDPi) as catalyst. The scope of the methodology is broad, encompassing a large varie-ty of enoxysilanes, and yielding 1,2-dioxanes or 1,2-dioxolanes. Peroxides can be converted into chiral alcohols or trans-epoxides, and the methodology was applied in a key step of the total synthesis of ethyl plakortide Z, enhancing the selectivi-ty compared to conventional a Lewis acid. Kinetic studies demonstrated that tert-butyldimethylsilylated nucleophiles are more potent than trimethylsilylated ones. Furthermore, it was observed that the reaction necessitates an induction period, indicating the formation of a silylium species that behaves as the true catalyst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".