Predictors of postsurgical retethering in pediatric fatty or tight filum terminale: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1167 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize pediatric patients with tight filum terminale (TFT) or fatty filum terminale (FFT) who experienced retethering after transection of the filum, and to determine the risk factors for retethering. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on May 31, 2023, using PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies detailing retethering following transection for TFT or FFT. Studies were then screened using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria with an overall cohort of 1167 patients evaluated for retethering following transection for TFT or FFT. The combined retethering rate across all retrospective studies was 3.4% (95% CI 1.6%-5.2%). A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of presenting symptoms, with the most common being lower-extremity weakness in the overall cohort (54.5%, 95% CI 32.6%-76.4%) and bowel or bladder dysfunction in the retethered cohort (57.9%, 95% CI 41.1%-74.8%). Patients who experienced retethering had a similar estimated prevalence of low-lying conus (71.1%, 95% CI 45.1%-97.1%) compared with the overall cohort (51.1%, 95% CI 39.3%-63.0%). The most common complication following surgery for the overall cohort was a wound complication (2.7%, 95% CI 0.8%-4.6%). Postoperative CSF leakage (OR 13.8, 95% CI 3.9-49.4) was a strong predictor of retethering. Sensory changes at initial presentation were also found to be a predictor of retethering (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5). Low-lying conus was not predictive of retethering. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sensory changes and postsurgical CSF leakage were associated with an increased retethering rate following transection of the filum in cases of tethered cord syndrome secondary to fatty filum terminale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.030 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".