MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403117427 · doi:10.3171/2024.9.peds24277

Predictors of postsurgical retethering in pediatric fatty or tight filum terminale: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1167 patients

2024· review· en· W4403117427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parker Smith, Mina Guirguis, Michael Farid, Kwadwo Darko, Shubhang Bhalla, Jason Wang, Umaru Barrie, Brett A. Whittemore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortCohort studyFilum terminaleRetrospective cohort studyComplicationSurgeryInternal medicineRadiologyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize pediatric patients with tight filum terminale (TFT) or fatty filum terminale (FFT) who experienced retethering after transection of the filum, and to determine the risk factors for retethering. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on May 31, 2023, using PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies detailing retethering following transection for TFT or FFT. Studies were then screened using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria with an overall cohort of 1167 patients evaluated for retethering following transection for TFT or FFT. The combined retethering rate across all retrospective studies was 3.4% (95% CI 1.6%-5.2%). A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of presenting symptoms, with the most common being lower-extremity weakness in the overall cohort (54.5%, 95% CI 32.6%-76.4%) and bowel or bladder dysfunction in the retethered cohort (57.9%, 95% CI 41.1%-74.8%). Patients who experienced retethering had a similar estimated prevalence of low-lying conus (71.1%, 95% CI 45.1%-97.1%) compared with the overall cohort (51.1%, 95% CI 39.3%-63.0%). The most common complication following surgery for the overall cohort was a wound complication (2.7%, 95% CI 0.8%-4.6%). Postoperative CSF leakage (OR 13.8, 95% CI 3.9-49.4) was a strong predictor of retethering. Sensory changes at initial presentation were also found to be a predictor of retethering (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5). Low-lying conus was not predictive of retethering. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sensory changes and postsurgical CSF leakage were associated with an increased retethering rate following transection of the filum in cases of tethered cord syndrome secondary to fatty filum terminale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery PediatricsSame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207