Structural variation in nebulin and its implications on phenotype and inheritance: establishing a dominant distal phenotype caused by large deletions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Structural variants (SVs) of the nebulin gene ( NEB ), including intragenic duplications, deletions, and copy number variation of the triplicate region, are an established cause of recessively inherited nemaline myopathies and related neuromuscular disorders. Large deletions have been shown to cause dominantly inherited distal myopathies. Here we provide an overview of 35 families with muscle disorders caused by such SVs in NEB . Methods Using custom Comparative Genomic Hybridization arrays, exome sequencing, short-read genome sequencing, custom Droplet Digital PCR, or Sanger sequencing, we identified pathogenic SVs in 35 families with NEB -related myopathies. Results In 23 families, recessive intragenic deletions and duplications or pathogenic gains of the triplicate region segregating with the disease in compound heterozygous form, together with a small variant in trans, were identified. In two families the SV was, however, homozygous. Eight families have not been described previously. In 12 families with a distal myopathy phenotype, eight unique, large deletions encompassing 52 to 97 exons in either heterozygous (n = 10) or mosaic (n = 2) state were identified. In the families where inheritance was recessive, no correlation could be made between the types of variants and the severity of the disease. In contrast, all patients with large dominant deletions in NEB had milder, predominantly distal muscle weakness. Discussion For the first time, we establish a clear and statistically significant association between large NEB deletions and a form of distal myopathy. In addition, we provide the hitherto largest overview of the spectrum of SVs in NEB .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".