ExoplaNeT accRetion mOnitoring sPectroscopic surveY (ENTROPY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. Accretion among planetary mass companions is a poorly understood phenomenon, due to the lack of both observational and theoretical studies. The detection of emission lines from accreting gas giants facilitates detailed investigations into this process. Aims. This work presents a detailed analysis of Balmer lines from one of the few known young, planetary-mass objects with observed emission, the isolated L2γ dwarf 2MASS J11151597+1937266 with a mass between 7 and 21 MJup and an age of 5–45 Myr, located at 45 ± 2 pc. Methods. We obtained the first high-resolution (R ~ 50 000) spectrum of the target with VLT/UVES, an echelle spectrograph operating in the near-ultraviolet to visible wavelengths (3200–6800 Å). Results. We report several resolved hydrogen (H I; H3–H6) and helium (He I; λ5875.6) emission lines in the spectrum. Based on the asymmetric line profiles of Hα and Hβ, the 10% width of Hα (199 ± 1 km s−1), tentative He I λ6678 emission, and indications of a disk from mid-infrared excess, we confirm ongoing accretion at this object. Using the Gaia update of the parallax, we revise its temperature to 1816 ± 63 K and radius to 1.5 ± 0.1 RJup. Analysis of observed H I profiles using a 1D planet-surface shock model implies a pre-shock gas velocity, v0 = 120−40+ 80 km s−1, and a pre-shock density, log(n0/cm−3) = 14−5+ 0. The pre-shock velocity points to a mass, Mp = 6−4+ 8 MJup, for the target. Combining H I line luminosities (Lline) and planetary Lline−Lacc (accretion luminosity) scaling relations, we derived a mass accretion rate, Ṁacc = 1.4−0.9+ 2.8 × 10−8 MJup yr−1. Conclusions. The line-emitting area predicted from the planet-surface shock model is very small (~0.03%), and points to a shock at the base of a magnetospherically induced funnel. The Hα profile exhibits a much stronger flux than predicted by the model that best fits the rest of the H I profiles, indicating that another mechanism than shock emission contributes to the Hα emission. Comparison of line fluxes and Ṁacc from archival moderate-resolution SDSS spectra indicate variable accretion at 2MASS J11151597+1937266.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".