MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Dimensional Time-Series Shapelet Based Real-Time Fault Detection and Localization on ISS Electrical Power Distribution System

2024· article· en· W4403127576 on OpenAlexafffund
Qin Liu, Weiran Chen, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Power (physics)Fault (geology)Real-time computingPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International space station (ISS) is a grand invention for human beings to have a chance at exploring the outer space. Its operation is completely dependent on the autonomous power distribution system which transforms energy by solar arrays from the sun. There is a high demand for a reliable monitoring system that can accurately and timely detect and localize faults in its power system for the special working environment of the ISS. In this paper, a fault detection and localization (FDL) based on multi-dimensional time-series trend extracted shapelet (MTES) method was proposed. A fast shapelet discovery was created to accelerate the process of extracting shape features from time-series signals collected from the ISS electrical power distribution system (EPDS). Then the techniques of randomization and information gain were exploited for the further shapelet selection. Finally, multi-dimensional time-series classification for FDL was solved by a designed random forest classifier. The real-time FDL measurement instrument was emulated on the Xilinx VCU128 FPGA board, while a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing platform was established to verify the effectiveness, execution speed, and accuracy of the MTES method. Comparing with other state-of-the-art data-driven methods, higher accuracy (above 96%) and easier hardware implementation were achieved using MTES

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid and Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207