MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403132846 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114835

Secretory IgA in breast milk protects against asthma through modulation of the gut microbiota

2024· article· en· W4403132846 on OpenAlexafffund
Katherine Donald, Antonio Serapio-Palacios, Zachary J. Gerbec, Tahereh Bozorgmehr, Ravi Holani, Ana Raquel Cruz, Pamela Schnupf, B. Brett Finlay

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGut floraAsthmaBreast milkBreast feedingImmunologyBiologyMedicineMicrobiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma susceptibility is linked to dysbiosis in early-life gut microbiota, and the antibody secretory immunoglobulin (Ig)A (SIgA) is a key determinant of gut microbiota composition. SIgA is obtained through breast milk during the critical early-life window. We use a mouse model of SIgA deficiency and the house dust mite (HDM) model of asthma to elucidate the role of maternal SIgA in modulating the early-life gut microbiota and asthma protection. Mice that do not receive maternal SIgA display a transient bloom of segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) in the small intestine during the early post-weaning period. Mice that do not receive maternal SIgA also display elevated T helper type 17 (Th17) cell activation in the intestine, which persists into adulthood and is associated with more severe inflammation in response to the HDM model of asthma. This study demonstrates a mechanism by which breast-milk-derived SIgA influences immune development and asthma susceptibility by modulating the early-life gut microbiota.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207