Digitalomics – digital transformation leading to omics insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Biomarker discovery is increasingly moving from single omics to multiomics, as well as from multi-cell omics to single-cell omics. These transitions have increasingly adopted digital transformation technologies to accelerate the progression from data to insight. Here, we will discuss the concept of 'digitalomics' and how digital transformation directly impacts biomarker discovery. This will ultimately assist clinicians in personalized therapy and precision-medicine treatment decisions. AREAS COVERED: Genotype-to-phenotype-based insight generation involves integrating large amounts of complex multiomic data. This data integration and analysis is aided through digital transformation, leading to better clinical outcomes. We also highlight the challenges and opportunities of Digitalomics, and provide examples of the application of Artificial Intelligence, cloud- and high-performance computing, and use of tensors for multiomic analysis workflows. EXPERT OPINION: Biomarker discovery, aided by digital transformation, is having a significant impact on cancer, cardiovascular, infectious, immunological, and neurological diseases, among others. Data insights garnered from multiomic analyses, combined with patient meta data, aids patient stratification and targeted treatment across a broad spectrum of diseases. Digital transformation offers time and cost savings while leading to improved patent healthcare. Here, we highlight the impact of digital transformation on multiomics- based biomarker discovery with specific applications related to oncology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".