Influence of punch coating surface properties on sticking during the tableting process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The present study evaluates the sticking propensity of Uncoated steel, and chromium nitride (CrN), zirconium nitride (ZrN), titanium nitride (TiN) and Ultracoat punch coatings during the tableting process of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) conducted on a Manesty® F3 single station tableting press.Methods Surface properties including surface roughness, surface free energy (SFE) and its components, the atomic percentage of surface polar functional groups and oxides measured with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to characterize the surface propensity to sticking.Results After five hours of tablet pressing, MCC powder particles were found to adhere to the TiN coated and the uncoated steel punches. Surface analysis show that surface roughness of all the tested punches was similar. The Lewis base SFE component (LB-comp) was found to govern the acid-base interactions of the tested surfaces, and its value was higher for punch surfaces affected by sticking. The surfaces exhibiting higher LB-comp are more prone to strong acid-base interactions with water molecules that evaporate from the powder bed during compression. Therefore, these surfaces adsorbed water and allow sticking through capillary adhesion force.Conclusion The total atomic percentage of the surface polar functional groups (PFG) and oxides was also high for the surfaces that stick to MCC during tableting, suggesting that hydrophilic molecules on the punch surface favor sticking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it