Cognitive correlates of circadian rhythm and sleep-wake behaviour in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients often experience reduced physical activity, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairment. However, reports on measurement of rest-activity rhythm and sleep-wake behavior and their impact on cognitive functions in COPD patients are limited. This study aimed to objectively measure circadian rhythms (rest-activity and ambient illuminance) and sleep behaviors in clinically stable COPD patients and their relationship with cognitive functions. The study involved 65 male COPD patients and 50 age-matched controls, monitored over 3-7 days using actigraphy. Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) followed by short interbal time estimation via time production and reproduction with reaction time measurement using TimeProd software. Findings indicated significant disruptions in circadian rhythms in COPD patients, characterized by lower mesor, amplitude, and autocorrelation coefficients compared to controls. Patients also reported poorer sleep quality and higher sleep fragmentation, with 85.7% displaying cognitive impairment. Notably, longer time estimations, increased variability in task performance, and slower reaction times suggested cognitive deterioration. Positive correlations emerged between rhythm parameters (amplitude and circadian quotient) and cognitive performance metrics. This highlights the relevance of circadian and sleep disturbances in COPD, suggesting that addressing these rhythms could help mitigate cognitive decline, potentially through chronotherapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".