MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403139005 · doi:10.9734/cjast/2024/v43i104433

Integrating Automation and Big Data in Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing: A Case Study of the Ultium Cells Joint Venture

2024· article· en· W4403139005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Journal of Applied Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint ventureJoint (building)Battery (electricity)Manufacturing engineeringAutomationLithium (medication)Lithium-ion batteryAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringCommerceMedicinePhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: To examine the integration of automation and big data in lithium-ion battery manufacturing using Ultium Cells joint venture as case study. Problem Statement: The havocs attached to the exhausts emission from fossil-fuel based automobiles are major concerns to the whole world. Records indicating lowering of air quality and depletion of the ozone layer have been reported. Furthermore, the quest to save money spent on non-renewable energy has necessitate the call for research studies on advancement of lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Also, the traditional battery manufacturing techniques production capacities cannot meet the demand for electric vehicles. Nonetheless, the consistency and quality control of the battery cell is challenging. Significance of Study: The use of electric vehicles is prevailing and thus has greatly influenced the need to technological improvement in the production of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) which are being utilized in electric vehicles. The analysis of big data can provide real-time decision-making and long-term process improvements. This technical review is an eye-opener for researchers on the need to integrate automation and big data in lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Methodology: Recent literature materials in form of books, journals and relevant published articles in the area of automation and big data in lithium-ion battery manufacturing were consulted. Discussion: In this technical review, consideration was given to the integration of automation and big data in lithium-ion battery manufacturing using Ultium Cells joint venture as a case study. The types of lithium-ion batteries and their assemblies were discussed. The battery cells contain the cathode, anode and electrolyte and come in three varieties of designs which are pouches, prismatic cans and cylindrical designs. One of the main requirements that enhance the automation of assembly line in Li-ion battery manufacturing is the use of the collected data from the survey as stated by the industry. The concept is made up of 6 modular sectors such that each sector has the capacity of being scaled up and down based on customer requirements. The three major steps involved in data-driven application to lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing are data acquisition, data warehouse and data mining. Conclusion: The integration of automation and big data in lithium-ion battery manufacturing has positively influenced the quality and quantity of the products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it