Education Research: Feasibility, Reliability and Educational Value of Neuromuscular Ultrasound Training in a Canadian Neurology Residency Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Point-of-care neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) is increasingly used in the evaluation of peripheral nervous system disorders; however, there remains a gap in education and training for neurology residents. We evaluated whether neurology residents can feasibly be trained in basic NMUS skills and nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement and whether they value incorporation of this training into their curriculum. Methods: ) of the median, ulnar, and fibular nerve at multiple sites were independently performed on 3 healthy volunteers and compared with measurements obtained by the trainer. Results: across all sites). Comparing pretraining and posttraining survey responses, there was a significant increase in agreement that basic NMUS operational skills were obtained and in confidence in independently measuring each nerve. NMUS training was considered a valuable component of a neurology residency program curriculum (median rating: strongly agree). Discussion: Neurology residents across stages of training can acquire basic NMUS and CSA measurement skills of the median and ulnar nerves after 2 half-days of training and value incorporation of NMUS training in their educational curriculum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".