Neuronal hypofunction and network dysfunction in a mouse model at an early stage of tauopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how early neuronal deficits occur in tauopathies, if these are associated with changes in neuronal network activity, and if they can be alleviated with therapies. METHODS: imaging in tauopathy mice at 6 versus 12 months, compared to controls, and treated the younger animals with a tau antibody. RESULTS: Neuronal function was impaired at 6 months but did not deteriorate further at 12 months, presumably because cortical tau burden was comparable at these ages. At 6 months, neurons were mostly hypoactive, with enhanced neuronal synchrony, and had dysregulated responses to stimulus. Ex vivo, electrophysiology revealed altered synaptic transmission and enhanced excitability of motor cortical neurons, which likely explains the altered network activity. Acute tau antibody treatment reduced pathological tau and gliosis and partially restored neuronal function. DISCUSSION: Tauopathies are associated with early neuronal deficits that can be attenuated with tau antibody therapy. HIGHLIGHTS: Neuronal hypofunction in awake and behaving mice in early stages of tauopathy. Altered network activity disrupted local circuitry engagement in tauopathy mice. Enhanced neuronal excitability and altered synaptic transmission in tauopathy mice. Tau antibody acutely reduced soluble phospho-tau and improved neuronal function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".