7537 Composite Pheochromocytoma-Ganglioneuroma Secreting Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: B. Brochu: None. Y. Collin: None. R. Temmar: None. F. Bernier: None. K. Dandurand: None. M. St-Jean: None. M. Massicotte: None. Background: Composite pheochromocytoma-ganglioneuroma is a rare tumor combining features of both pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) and neurogenic tumors. Cosecretion of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is even less common and highlights the diverse secretory potential of these tumors. Clinical Case: An 80-year-old woman presented with severe chronic diarrhea that had been progressively worsening over the past 10 years. The diarrhea was associated with chronic hyponatremia between 128 and 132 mmol/L. She also had mild hypertension, with a mean blood pressure of 145/90 mm Hg. An abdominal CT scan revealed a right adrenal mass of 68 mm x 44 mm x 50 mm with a density of 19 HU without contrast. A 24-hour urinary collection demonstrated normetanephrines (NM) levels at 3.5 times the upper limit of normal. A 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated significant uptake only in the adrenal mass. Because of the ongoing severe diarrhea, that is unusual in the context of NM secreting PPGL, serum VIP level was measured and came back at nearly three times the upper limit of normal. A provisional diagnosis of pheochromocytoma with VIP and catecholamines cosecretion was made and surgical resection by laparotomy was performed without complication. Pathology demonstrated a composite tumor combining a pheochromocytoma and a ganglioneuroma, with a Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score (PASS) score of 3. Tumor immunohistochemical staining was positive for VIP in both pheochromocytoma and ganglioneuroma cells. After surgery, diarrhea and hyponatremia resolved and blood pressure normalized. Conclusion: This is one of the very rare cases described in the current literature of a composite pheochromocytoma coproducing catecholamines and VIP. While the two tumors might have developed synchronously, the finding of VIP secretion in the pheochromocytoma and the ganglioneuroma suggest that both tumors might originate from the same cell. Presentation: 6/1/2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".